EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/000918_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Mon Oct 16 14:54:23 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA118370462; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 14:54:23 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from gw.provo.novell.com by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA118270443; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 14:54:03 -0700
Received: from novell.com by gw.provo.novell.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
    id AA29319; Mon, 16 Oct 95 15:48:20 MDT
Received: from PRV-INTERNET-Message_Server by novell.com
    with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 15:48:19 -0600
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 15:52:50 -0600
From: Mathew Mower <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Subject:  Morphing magic -  NOT!?!?
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but . . . .

Why is it that LW requires exact point correspondence for object
morphs?

I'm sure that I have seen other programs that allow arbitrary object
morphs (at least I did see cubes to spheres).  Is this a limitation
for all packages or just LW.

It seems to me (JMO) that it would be nice if LW would allow you to
select two objects and define a morph defined by parameters like
vertical axis, etc.  I can see that there would be some possibilities
that would be complex but in a similar way that ER does a 2D morph,
shouldn't you be able to define that general areas will shrink to
become XXX.

MM

--
Mathew Mower <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]